Must-Read for City Innovators: “Films from the Future. The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies” – Andrew Maynard. My Review.

My end of year break provided me with a much welcomed opportunity to have a dig at a growing pile of books I had wanted to read. One of the books on top of the list: “Films from the Future. The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies” by Arizona State University’s Andrew Maynard. The title is somewhat misleading, as it suggests low-threshold, easy for all science through the lens of popular sci-fi movies. Instead, Maynard has managed to produce a very important book – if not a must-read- for anyone interested or actively engaged in the world of innovation, science and technology – if not in fact anyone.

Maynard does not engage in an analysis of the top ten sci-fi movies ever made. No extrapolations from Black Mirror episodes, no big philosophical review of The Matrix twenty years after its first release. Instead, Maynard has selected movies – some of them great, some of them less well known or not so great – that serve the purpose of illustrating and, at times, driving the larger narrative Maynard wants to bring the reader.

Maynard carefully navigates that larger space that serves as the arena of big and often controversial topics such artificial intelligence, genetic manipulation, overpopulation, climate change – among others. A space that gets defined by science, innovation, technology, organization and ethics. Maynard moderates, where others prescribe. He debunks myths and hypes by means of reasoning that is at times scientific, at times ethical and always honest. He effectively addresses what I call determinist “exponentialism” – a pattern of reasoning that ends up in seemingly inevitable singularities or climate catastrophes and the science activism it can produce. Maynard does not state singularities or climate catastrophes will not happen, nor does he state science activism is a bad thing. But rather than getting obliterated by the no-escape horizon of a black hole, Maynard pulls you out and lets you land back on Earth and has you digest synthesis instead. Maynard addresses such exponentialism as a way of thinking where one is at risk of amplifying current biases in human reasoning rather than moderating it. Maynard never indulges in absolutes (only Dark Lords of the Sith deal in those), but he does counter the attitudes and patterns of reasoning of those that do – whether it is the absoluteness that stems from blind tech optimism, exponentialist determinism or a scientist working in perfect isolation, all of these variations get exposed, carefully and balanced.

As a ‘smart city’ professional, I particularly enjoyed the chapters where Maynard effectively addresses what I call ‘solutionism’ – the phenomenon of solutions getting produced no one wants or that do not address a genuine problem. Maynard has the reader sit back in the author’s virtual cinema to view the 1950’s movie “The Man in the White Suit” starring Sir Alec Guinness. In it, the quint-essential inventor-scientist develops a fabric that cannot be stained. He assumes people will hurry to embrace his invention to find that not to be the case. As with the Luddites in 19th century England not because people are opposed to new technologies or innovations per se, but because other care-abouts were never taken into consideration by the inventor. He had failed to ask. This is one of the many pitfalls smart city leaders and smart city technology solution providers have found themselves in. In Maynard’s words: “Most scientists (including engineers and technologists) I’ve met and worked with want to improve and enrich people’s lives. They have what I believe is a genuine commitment to serving the public good in most cases. And they freely and openly use this to justify their work. Yet surprisingly few of them stop to think about what the “public good” means, or to ask others for their opinions and ideas.

Science, innovation and technologies can fail us for multiple reasons. Because they fail to address a need. Because they aren’t matched by a plan. Because people have a habit of losing their awe over something new rather quickly. As a funny illustration to the latter: I once read a funny theory that could have come straight out of the Hitchhiker’s Guide to Galaxy: the reason alien civilizations haven’t come to visit us is that whenever a given civilization is smart enough to invent something like Warp propulsion getting you across the galaxy, people are too busy playing video games all the time. Joking aside: Our relationship with technology is more complex than it being governed by ignorance. Or fear. Or the enthusiasm of the scientist working in perfect isolation. Maynard: “Irrespective of how deep our science is, or how powerful and complex our technologies are, we cannot hope to build a better, more resilient future through science and technology if we don’t understand our relationship with them in the first place.”

Indeed – that is not just the core of the matter fore those that find themselves associated with science, new technologies and innovations on a daily basis. This holds true for all of us. Maynard: “It’s all well and good hoping that scientists and technologists act responsibly. But responsibility here also means that we collectively need to give a damn about the future we’re creating, and whether it’s the future we want for ourselves and for generations to come.” Reading Maynard’s book is a great and enjoyable step on that collective and individual journey.


“Films from the Future. The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies” – Andrew Maynard

Mango Publishing Group

Available on Amazon



Geef een reactie

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd.